Skip to content

Advice and tips for those undertaking peer review

Peer review of research articles is an essential component of the publication process but it places a considerable burden on the senior scientists called upon to perform the task. The training and development of junior researchers in the practice of peer review is needed to lighten the load. Recently, BMC Medicine has tackled this issue with the publication of a collection of articles, written by experts, aimed at providing tips and advice for junior reviewers as well as being a reference source for all reviewers

The four open access articles cover a range of issues and a series of tutorials have been written to provide guidance on how to achieve constructive peer reviews based on specific study designs. Alam and Patel introduce the tutorials and highlight the need for training of individuals in peer reviewing. David Moher gives direction on the strategy that should be adopted for the peer review of a systematic review and meta-analysis while Greenwood and Freeman tackle the problem of reviewing statistical analyses when one is not a statistician. Finally Del Mar and Hoffmann suggest ways to identify flaws in randomised controlled trials to ensure that the quality of the research published is of a high standard.

Obviously all of the four articles have been peer reviewed!

Peer review

 

Categories

Peer review

Aspire Scientific Ltd View All

Ryan co-runs Aspire Scientific, a dynamic, forward-thinking medical writing agency. Ryan has a passion for innovation, science and ethical communication.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: