Read Suzanne Farley’s perspectives on the steps one publisher is taking to address the growing problem of research misconduct.
A recent survey assessed the prevalence of editors altering peer review reports. Read about the results here.
The third webinar in the Biomedical Transparency Summit Series considered the impact of COVID-19 on research transparency and data sharing.
Find out more about Springer Nature’s latest open access publishing options – and the concerns that some have raised.
Find out more about what was covered during the second 2021 webinar from the Center for Biomedical Research Transparency.
Read Ivan Oransky’s take on the retraction landscape and his perspectives on how to tackle research integrity issues in the future.
Data sharing is crucial for reproducibility. Iain Hrynaszkiewicz shares his thoughts on how publishers can promote its uptake.
Find out more about what was covered during the first 2021 webinar from the Center for Biomedical Research Transparency.
It is standard practice to name professional medical writers in publications, but how should we acknowledge subcontracted or freelance support?
Sandra Petty discusses the Null Hypothesis Initiative and looks to the future of reporting negative data.
The 17th Annual Meeting of ISMPP will be held virtually on April 12-14, 2021: register now!
Find out more about what this resource has to offer.
Professor Marcus Munafò discusses the importance of reproducibility in scientific research and how we can overcome barriers to achieving it.
Missed the meeting? Read our report to get up to speed!
Find out more about the concerns that have been raised around the preservation of open access journals and their content, plus the solutions proposed.
Find out why PLOS wants institutions to pay an annual open access fee under the Community Action Publishing model, rather than charging researchers per article.