Medical Publishing Insights and Practices (MPIP) initiative members share perspectives on the benefits of publishing industry-sponsored research open access.
A recent BMJ editorial discusses the benefits and risks of the use of preprints during the current coronavirus pandemic.
Tips on disclosures of interest from the Medical Publishing Insights and Practices Initiative (MPIP).
Find out more about the impact the new ICMJE disclosure form will have on authors publishing in medical journals.
Many journals ask submitting authors to suggest recommended peer reviewers, potentially risking bias and misconduct. Do the benefits outweigh these risks?
We summarise the key changes to the ICMJE recommendations for authors and medical publication professionals.
The MAP newsletter explores an issue faced by medical publication professionals.
Transparency and reproducibility are now synonymous with medical publications, but actions speak louder than words. A recent study examines whether progress has been made.
Find out why financial relationships are not always correctly disclosed and how better transparency could be achieved.
The ICMJE recently updated its recommendations, providing guidance on issues such as use of preprint servers, conflict of interest reporting and journal metrics.
Tim Koder reviews the potential for ORCiD, CRediT and Convey to increase transparency and accountability in medical publishing.
Dr Richard Smith reviews the potential pitfalls of textbooks in a recent opinion piece for The BMJ.
Missed ISMPP EU 2018? Hannah Mace provides a summary of the meeting’s poster presentations.
From February, Nature journals will ask authors to disclose possible non-financial conflicts of interest, in a bid to further increase transparency in the publication of scientific work.