
Monitoring open science: what key practices should we measure?
Discover the results of a consensus study in the biomedical research community.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Discover the results of a consensus study in the biomedical research community.
Find out how authors’ self-disclosures compare with payment data reported by the medical industry.
New study maps ties between the medical product industry and healthcare ecosystem, exposing regulatory and transparency issues.
Learn how a dataset of nearly half a million researchers can be used to reduce bias and increase equity.
Find out more about what was covered during the first 2021 webinar from the Center for Biomedical Research Transparency.
Medical Publishing Insights and Practices (MPIP) initiative members share perspectives on the benefits of publishing industry-sponsored research open access.
A recent BMJ editorial discusses the benefits and risks of the use of preprints during the current coronavirus pandemic.
Tips on disclosures of interest from the Medical Publishing Insights and Practices Initiative (MPIP).
Find out more about the impact the new ICMJE disclosure form will have on authors publishing in medical journals.
Many journals ask submitting authors to suggest recommended peer reviewers, potentially risking bias and misconduct. Do the benefits outweigh these risks?
We summarise the key changes to the ICMJE recommendations for authors and medical publication professionals.
The MAP newsletter explores an issue faced by medical publication professionals.
Transparency and reproducibility are now synonymous with medical publications, but actions speak louder than words. A recent study examines whether progress has been made.
Find out why financial relationships are not always correctly disclosed and how better transparency could be achieved.
The ICMJE recently updated its recommendations, providing guidance on issues such as use of preprint servers, conflict of interest reporting and journal metrics.
Tim Koder reviews the potential for ORCiD, CRediT and Convey to increase transparency and accountability in medical publishing.