
eLife shifts to publishing ‘reviewed preprints’, ending accept/reject decisions
eLife hopes inclusion of open peer review reports and standardised assessments will help improve transparency and accessibility of research.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
eLife hopes inclusion of open peer review reports and standardised assessments will help improve transparency and accessibility of research.
AI-based science comes under scrutiny: read about the growing crisis in machine learning.
Find out why, despite implementation of mandates, current research data may not be FAIR.
Read about the new weapon in the fight against bogus scientific research articles.
What’s standing in the way of researchers adopting good practices on clinical trial data sharing and transparency?
Read about the results of Nature’s transparent peer review pilot and how it could benefit the research community.
Find out how authors’ self-disclosures compare with payment data reported by the medical industry.
A recent analysis of randomised controlled vaccine trials suggests there are still improvements to be made.
Learn all about the new WHO data sharing policy and their practical guidance on data sharing plans.
Read about the potential impacts of large language models, and what needs to happen to ensure they benefit, rather than hinder, scientific fields.
An analysis of 47 BMJ journals found that under one-third of peer reviewers were women.
An analysis of early COVID-19 preprints identified low uptake of data sharing statements and making data accessible.
Adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts continues to be inadequate, nearly 15 years after their release.
Learn about the current failings in race and ethnicity reporting in regulatory documents and medical literature and how they can be overcome.
A recent study revealed that many researchers fail to comply with their data sharing statement.
Read about the new 28-item checklist developed to aid decision-making in health economic evaluations.