Read about their call to action for the pharmaceutical industry to increase sharing of clinical trial data.
Find out what’s in the new CONSORT-ROUTINE checklist for randomised controlled trials using cohorts and routinely collected data.
Why loss of confidence in previously published findings does not necessarily lead to self-correction of the scientific record
A new study looks at why researchers may question their past conclusions and how likely they are to disclose this publicly.
We’ve heard of open data, but should we also consider open methods as standard?
Analysis of Elsevier’s article metadata and invoicing information provides insights into the uptake of hybrid open access.
European countries can’t agree on what counts as research misconduct, creating potential pitfalls for researchers.
The gender gap in publications is well documented, but does peer review contribute to this bias? A recent study investigated.
Publisher of Science journals update their Green open access policy for authors of research funded by cOAlition S organisations to allow Plan S compliance.
The automated tool, scite Reference Check, is helping to address a longstanding issue in scientific publishing.
Find out how media outlets reported on COVID-19 preprints in the early months of the pandemic.
The PRISMA-S checklist aims to ensure transparent reporting and maximum reproducibility of literature searches performed as part of systematic reviews.
Find out how COVID-19 has benefited data sharing and what your organisation can do to advance open science from the State of Open Data 2020 report.
Find out if preprints are up to scratch when it comes to transparent reporting and whether traditional peer review can raise the bar higher.
Find out how implementing key principles of evidence communication can help audiences make informed decisions on clinical research.
Combatting research integrity breaches: insights from Suzanne Farley, Director of the Springer Nature Research Integrity Group
Read Suzanne Farley’s perspectives on the steps one publisher is taking to address the growing problem of research misconduct.
A recent survey assessed the prevalence of editors altering peer review reports. Read about the results here.