When politics meets publishing: researchers fight back
Read about how federal pressures to remove EDI-related data are impacting the scientific community – and what they’re doing about it.
Over 100 institutions back eLife’s reviewed preprint model
Find out more about how eLife’s loss of impact factor has been received.
Restoring trust in science: a proposed framework for verifying researcher identity
Publication fraud is eroding trust. Find out how one new framework encourages the active authentication of research paper contributors.
Safeguarding scientific image quality and integrity: what more can be done?
Explore how publishers, institutions, and researchers are improving the quality of scientific images.
Wiley develops AI guidelines in response to demand from researchers
Find out more about the guidelines aiming to embrace use of AI, ethically.
Difficulty assigning peer review is exacerbating publication delays: is it time for a new approach?
With peer review requests skyrocketing in recent years, securing reviewers is more challenging than ever: discover some potential solutions.
Retractions and corrections are falling under the radar: should open repositories step up?
Open access repositories are underreporting corrections and retractions. Discover how they can step up to pave the way for effective archiving.
Is high-volume publishing threatening research integrity?
As another study reveals an alarming number of hyperprolific authors, find out more about how high-volume publishing can impact research integrity.
Are open science metrics at odds with research assessment reform?
Discover how efforts to promote open science through new metrics may conflict with initiatives to reform research assessment.
What do the public think of preprints?
Get up to speed on why the general public struggle to understand preprint status.