While mirror journals have been proposed as an alternative to hybrid journals for open access publishing under Plans S, recent guidance indicates they may not be compliant.
A recent article from Science explores how meta-analyses may be less authoritative than they seem.
Researchers at Nature uncover the world’s most hyperprolific authors and question our understanding of scientific authorship.
In a recent opinion piece the traditional scientific publishing model is reviewed alongside recent efforts to change it.
Tips for evidence-based publication planning, including gap and SWOT analysis, are provided in a recent issue of the MAP newsletter.
The Wellcome Trust announces a new open access policy, which includes five key updates.
Journals and funders pledge to publish peer review reports in a move to increase transparency of the publication process.
Tim Ellison reviews the growing importance of preprints in medical publishing.
Is the apparent efficacy of treatments being altered by bias? A recent study takes a closer look at the cumulative effects of reporting and citation biases.
Is your institute breaking European clinical trial reporting rules? Find out using the new EU trials tracker, part of the AllTrials initiative.
Learn more about the potential impact of cOAlition S: a commitment to make all European publicly funded research freely available by 2020.
Gain a better understanding of issues surrounding the preparation of encore presentations for congresses.
Get up to speed with the latest tips for increasing patient involvement in publications from Elevate Magazine.
How can journal growth affect impact factor and what can be done to avoid it?
In a recent publication, researchers examine whether funder open access platforms are a good idea.
The Publication Plan team presented their own research at this year’s ISMPP meetings.