Skip to content

Will ‘results-free’ peer review reduce publication bias?

BMC Psychology is launching a pilot study ahead of a planned randomised controlled trial to investigate whether a results-free peer review process will lead to less publication bias. While null results are seen as scientifically important, it is currently less likely that such studies will be published compared with those with positive results. It is postulated that results-free peer review could reduce bias, and increase publication of studies with strong rationale and design.

A press release from BioMed Central, which publishes the journal, explains that reviewers of research manuscripts submitted for publication will not be able to see the results or discussion sections until the end of the review process. A publication decision would instead be based on the study premise and methods only. After investigating whether results-free peer review is viable, a trial will compare it to the standard process.

While results-free peer review could be effective in reducing publication bias in the social sciences, some doubt its applicability to other fields, such as the physical sciences. In many fields, experimental techniques are fairly standard and the results and discussion sections are vital for judging the importance of the study.

results-free

——————————————————–

Summary by Philippa Flemming, PhD from Aspire Scientific.

Categories

Medical writing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: