
Updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews: The PRISMA 2020 statement
Get up to speed with the recently published PRISMA 2020 statement, which contains updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Get up to speed with the recently published PRISMA 2020 statement, which contains updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews.
Learn how using social media to share your research could increase its impact, and why this is becoming increasingly important.
The 2021 European Meeting of ISMPP will take place virtually on 26–27 January: Register now!
Find out more about how disproportionate care loads, exacerbated by the pandemic, are impacting women’s ability to participate in scientific publishing.
Simon Stones gives his view on the practical steps that patients, publishers and the pharmaceutical industry can take to boost patient involvement in research.
As demand for transparency increases, many journals are adopting open peer review: learn more about best-practice guidelines for implementing such systems.
An article in the MAP newsletter examines how plain language summaries are key in making peer-reviewed biomedical research accessible to all.
How do predatory journals get indexed in PubMed and how big a problem is it?
Add your contributions to the 8th annual MedComms Day.
Jan Seal-Roberts provides a topical discussion about plain-language summaries including why we should include these in our publications.
Specific guidelines describing best practice for developing conference abstracts and presentations are now available.
Researchers propose that self-organising peer review for preprints could be the future of scholarly publishing.
Share your expertise with the medical publishing community! The Publication Plan is now welcoming guest articles.
Plagiarism detection software and the originality scores they generate are useful, but find out why human input is a fundamental part of the process.
Statisticians and over 800 signatories challenge the concept of ‘statistical significance’, calling for an end to overstated claims and missed discoveries.
Missed the 15th Annual Meeting of ISMPP? Read our meeting report to get up to speed!