Skip to content

How long does a scientific paper need to be? Do length limits have a detrimental effect on scientific reporting?

A blog this week by the London School of Economics and Political Science questions the current policy of many journals to restrict manuscript word count.

In principle, length limits should help with the accessibility and readability of a scientific paper. But in practice these limits often achieve the opposite effect. Now that journals are becoming online-only, the author of the blog – Dorothy Bishop – argues that lengths limits are far less relevant. She states: “Yes, we should encourage authors to be succinct, but not so succinct that scientific communication is compromised“.

Never miss a post

Enter your email address below to follow our blog and receive new posts by email.

Never miss
a post

Enter your email address below to follow The Publication Plan and receive new posts by email.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

One thought on “How long does a scientific paper need to be? Do length limits have a detrimental effect on scientific reporting? Leave a comment

  1. Every time I submit an article for publication the editor replies
    ‘Please send the whole article’ to avoid saying ‘It’s damn short!’
    So I am sending only ‘statements’ for publication.

    Boghos L. Artinian MD

Leave a Reply to Boghos L. ArtinianCancel reply

Discover more from The Publication Plan for everyone interested in medical writing, the development of medical publications, and publication planning

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading