Jackie Marchington, Director of Global Operations at Caudex, discusses good practice for conference abstracts and presentations
Help and guidance for writing narrative reviews and Delphi consensus statements.
Does professional medical writing support impact the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting?
Findings of a systematic review show working with professional medical writers positively affects measures of quality, ethics and timeliness.
The MAP newsletter explores an issue faced by medical publication professionals.
As demand for transparency increases, many journals are adopting open peer review: learn more about best-practice guidelines for implementing such systems.
A recent article from Nature news delves into clinical trial reporting following evidence showing that some universities are failing to meet EU regulations.
Plagiarism detection software and the originality scores they generate are useful, but find out why human input is a fundamental part of the process.
A recent article in Medical Writing provides insights into the importance of patient reported outcomes in publication planning and guidance for best practice.
Increasing quality and transparency of preclinical data: an opportunity for publication professionals?
An article in the MAP newsletter examines how publication professionals could help to increase preclinical publishing standards.
The impact of the AMWA–EMWA–ISMPP Joint Position Statement on the Role of Professional Medical Writers is revealed in the MAP newsletter.
Gain a better understanding of issues surrounding the preparation of encore presentations for congresses.
Get up to speed with the latest tips for increasing patient involvement in publications from Elevate Magazine.
A recent issue of the MAP newsletter provides best practice tips for the management of publications between research collaborators.