
Is it time to redesign peer review?
Read about proposed strategies to make peer review less burdensome and improve the quality of published research.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Read about proposed strategies to make peer review less burdensome and improve the quality of published research.
Read more on the results of a survey that asked 47,000 academics about their opinions, behaviours, and experiences surrounding research integrity.
Read about a proposed 5-part framework for strengthening the relationship between research and public policy.
Read about the difficulties in identifying retracted articles and mitigating their real world impact.
Read our topline summary of what the Action Plan for Diamond Open Access is, and how it was developed.
Learn how the pandemic has affected the publication output of male and female scientists, and the proposed reasons for observed disparities.
Learn about the next step in the Plan S drive for open science – a letter to publishers calling for greater transparency on open access policies and contracts.
Learn about the importance of short communications in scientific publishing and the potential impact of their decline.
Find out why journals are planning to ask authors, reviewers, and editors about their gender, race, and ethnicity.
Read about the proposed actions to increase social justice in scientific publishing.
Get up to date with the growing fraudulent impersonation problem hitting journals publishing special issues.
Find out the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the scientific community.
Preprints have changed the way that authors can receive feedback on their manuscript; but when does it verge on ‘unethical’ duplicate peer review?
Find out how artificial intelligence tools are influencing the future of scientific communication.
Read the results of a pilot study on the impact of data availability statements on publication workflows.
The suggestion that preprints could replace traditional journals has been debated. Dr Haseeb Irfanullah provides arguments against this view.