Learn how scientists put ChatGPT’s abilities as a scientific researcher and author to the test.
Learn about practical guidance to help journals and data repositories handle ethical concerns raised during research data publication.
How could reforms to the existing scholarly publishing model be implemented?
Read about the rise in the use of embellished language in academic writing, including the drivers behind this trend.
Learn about the driving forces behind authors’ involvement with predatory journals and strategies to address this issue.
Find out how AI can be used to increase efficiency and predict ‘successful’ papers in medical publishing.
Do we need to worry about the presence of retracted articles in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines?
Nature bans AI-generated images and videos – read about the concerns that led to the journal’s decision.
What can be done to ensure that ChatGPT is used responsibly?
Read about proposed strategies to make peer review less burdensome and improve the quality of published research.
Read more on the results of a survey that asked 47,000 academics about their opinions, behaviours, and experiences surrounding research integrity.
Read about a proposed 5-part framework for strengthening the relationship between research and public policy.
Read about the difficulties in identifying retracted articles and mitigating their real world impact.
Read our topline summary of what the Action Plan for Diamond Open Access is, and how it was developed.
Learn how the pandemic has affected the publication output of male and female scientists, and the proposed reasons for observed disparities.
An open letter on open access: call for greater clarity and transparency of open access terms and conditions
Learn about the next step in the Plan S drive for open science – a letter to publishers calling for greater transparency on open access policies and contracts.