EQUATOR and COS join forces to bring open science to the fore
Plans for a strategic 3-year partnership between the EQUATOR Network and Centre for Open Science.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Plans for a strategic 3-year partnership between the EQUATOR Network and Centre for Open Science.
Richard Sever talks about the future of peer review, the role of preprint servers, and how we might untangle research evaluation from research dissemination.
Learn more about the barriers faced by digital health technology and how patient engagement is key to breaking them down.
According to Delta Think, the 2024 larger-than-average rise in APCs is deceptive; find out how APCs are actually getting cheaper in real terms.
Explore how machine translation and generative AI have changed the medical translation landscape, for better or worse.
Protect your research from predatory publishers with these top tips from the editors of legitimate open access journals.
Plain language summaries of publication could help patients, but what if they aren’t reading them? Find out how publishers can boost patient interaction with PLSPs.
Read about practical tools aimed at introducing more inclusive practices in academic publishing.
Find out more about a new AI service to detect fake manuscripts.
Planning to write an overview of systematic reviews? Uncover essential guidance on the effective use of tools to assess and minimise bias.
Read about inequities in terms of which researchers benefit most from open access and what could be done to help.
Biomedical science retractions quadrupled between 2000 and 2020, mostly due to research misconduct: why?
Familiarise yourself with key cOAlition S processes and future directions for Plan S and open access publishing.
How does Japan plan to make all publicly funded research free to read? The move to green open access begins with investing ¥10 billion.
Read about a new checklist developed to facilitate transparent reporting of consensus methods.
Find out what happened in the year since eLife ended accept/reject decisions in favour of ‘reviewed preprints’.