Legacy publishing and open access: how to detect the true predator
Find out more about how some are labelling even legitimate open access journals as ‘predatory’.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Find out more about how some are labelling even legitimate open access journals as ‘predatory’.
Discover how enhanced publication content and novel metrics can improve healthcare professional engagement with scientific publications.
Find out why measures to improve the credibility of preprints may be at odds with their core strengths.
Get up to speed with the latest editorial from ICMJE to protect your publications from predatory journals and safeguard the integrity of scientific publishing.
Diamond OA is gaining momentum as gold OA remains under scrutiny. Will diamond offer all the solutions?
Discover what global stakeholders thought about open access proposal “Towards Responsible Publishing” ahead of cOAlition S’s response.
Explore how increasing open access revenue signals challenges for global researchers trying to publish free-to-read articles. How can publishing move forward?
Learn about the unexpected drop in open access market share identified by Delta Think: what’s driving it, and will it continue?
According to Delta Think, the 2024 larger-than-average rise in APCs is deceptive; find out how APCs are actually getting cheaper in real terms.
Protect your research from predatory publishers with these top tips from the editors of legitimate open access journals.
Familiarise yourself with key cOAlition S processes and future directions for Plan S and open access publishing.
Find out what happened in the year since eLife ended accept/reject decisions in favour of ‘reviewed preprints’.
A recent DOI analysis highlights shortfalls in current digital preservation methods.
Explore the results of a new ISMPP poll on how to tackle an inadvertent submission to a predatory journal.
Learn how the ‘diversity factor’ could be used to evaluate the true impact of health research.
Find out more about the barriers non-native English speakers face in scientific publishing, and initiatives that are starting to help.