
What motivates researchers to review papers?
A recent survey provides insights into the attitudes and motivations of reviewers. Can the findings help to improve the peer review process?
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
A recent survey provides insights into the attitudes and motivations of reviewers. Can the findings help to improve the peer review process?
Publons data show many predatory journals enlist scholars to perform peer review – young researchers should be particularly wary.
As an increasing number of journals pilot transparent peer review, data indicate that open peer review does not compromise the process – at least when reviewers can stay anonymous.
A global survey examines the current peer review landscape and provides suggestions to combat ‘reviewer fatigue’.