A recent BMJ editorial discusses the benefits and risks of the use of preprints during the current coronavirus pandemic.
COVID-19 has had an unprecedented global impact. Now, a Digital Science report asks how the research landscape has adapted to these extreme circumstances.
Publishers show enthusiasm for preprints by allowing transfer from preprint servers to submission sites and by integrating preprint platforms into manuscript submission workflows.
Could medical publishing benefit from a more dynamic system, where open publications can be updated and engagement is sought across disciplines?
There are a number of publishing features to consider when selecting a journal. Find out how researchers are navigating the options to their best advantage.
Researchers propose that self-organising peer review for preprints could be the future of scholarly publishing.
Missed the 15th Annual Meeting of ISMPP? Read our meeting report to get up to speed!
Missed ISMPP EU 2019? Read our meeting report to get up to speed!
In an article published in The New York Times, Professor Aaron E. Carroll critiques the peer review system and provides a number of suggestions for improvements.
Tim Ellison reviews the growing importance of preprints in medical publishing.
Mary Yianni, Publisher at Taylor and Francis, reviews the different models of peer review and the emerging role of preprints.
Missed the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMPP? Read the second part of our meeting report to get up to speed!
Missed the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMPP? Read our meeting report to get up to speed!
Can preprints be cited in the same way as papers published in a peer reviewed journal, or do we need to define new standards?
Public Library of Science (PLOS) recently announced that all articles submitted to PLOS journals will automatically be published as preprints on bioRxiv.