TagPreprint

Finding the way forward for peer review

Read about ways in which peer review could develop and diversify to keep up with modern research demands.

eLife hopes inclusion of open peer review reports and standardised assessments will help improve transparency and accessibility of research.

ASAPbio summarise the newly developed FAST principles, a set of best practices to foster engagement in public preprint review.

Valérie Philippon shares her perspectives on the value of including data beyond those generated in clinical trials in publication plans.

Preprints have changed the way that authors can receive feedback on their manuscript; but when does it verge on ‘unethical’ duplicate peer review?

Find out more about ICMJE’s latest recommendations on the use of preprints in scientific publishing.

Read some perspectives on how integrating presubmission and preprint reviews into journal systems could facilitate the current peer review process.

The suggestion that preprints could replace traditional journals has been debated. Dr Haseeb Irfanullah provides arguments against this view.

Find out how media outlets reported on COVID-19 preprints in the early months of the pandemic.

Find out if preprints are up to scratch when it comes to transparent reporting and whether traditional peer review can raise the bar higher.

Missed the meeting? Read our report to get up to speed!

Recommendations from 3 leading medical communication organisations aim to protect the integrity of published scientific and medical research.

The third webinar in the Biomedical Transparency Summit Series considered the impact of COVID-19 on research transparency and data sharing.

A recent BMJ editorial discusses the benefits and risks of the use of preprints during the current coronavirus pandemic.