Cabells and CIBER Research tell us why predatory publishing remains commonplace across the world.
Learn how predatory journals are identified, and why journal ‘watchlists’ and ‘safelists’ have their own pitfalls.
Kyle Siler describes the complexities of differentiating predatory and non-predatory publishing.
Publons data show many predatory journals enlist scholars to perform peer review – young researchers should be particularly wary.
Tips on journal selection from MPIP.
Cabell’s Journal Blacklist expands further.
Ruairi Mackenzie provides a personal account of attending a “fake” conference run by Conference Series in a recent article for Technology Networks.
A recent blog for The Scholarly Kitchen explores the pros and cons of a searchable predatory journal directory.
How do predatory journals get indexed in PubMed and how big a problem is it?