Over 100 institutions back eLife’s reviewed preprint model
Find out more about how eLife’s loss of impact factor has been received.
Find out more about how eLife’s loss of impact factor has been received.
Find out about the key findings from ISMPP’s Publication Extenders Evidence Resource.
Discover how eLife’s innovative peer review model has led to the removal of its impact factor.
Discover how enhanced publication content and novel metrics can improve healthcare professional engagement with scientific publications.
Learn how the ‘diversity factor’ could be used to evaluate the true impact of health research.
Read about the results from an artificial intelligence analysis of over 10,000 peer review reports.
Listen to Alice Choi discuss traditional and new journal metrics in this new podcast from ISMPP.
Find out more about the TOP Factor, an alternative metric to the impact factor, evaluating academic journals based on open science policies.
Tips on journal selection from MPIP.
Researchers continue to use the impact factor as a metric for their career progression, but is it a matter of misconstrued peer pressure?