
Improving diversity and inclusivity in scientific publishing: can ‘editormetrics’ help?
Learn how a dataset of nearly half a million researchers can be used to reduce bias and increase equity.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Learn how a dataset of nearly half a million researchers can be used to reduce bias and increase equity.
How many predatory journals are indexed on the citation database Scopus, and what can be done to address the issue?
Find out more about what this resource has to offer.
Find out more about the concerns that have been raised around the preservation of open access journals and their content, plus the solutions proposed.
The increasing range of publication choices and demand for open access are explored in this sponsored article from Taylor & Francis Group.
With widespread and growing support for increased data sharing, what can we learn from the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project and its collaboration with Johnson & Johnson?
How do predatory journals get indexed in PubMed and how big a problem is it?
Discover how to track the proliferation of initiatives aimed at improving the peer review process.
Cochrane members have become divided over growing centralisation of the organisation. An article in The BMJ explores the question, “Has Cochrane lost its way?”.
An analysis by Science Magazine of Retraction Watch’s new database challenges a number of common perceptions surrounding retractions and reveals some important key themes.
Google launches a new search tool to facilitate the discoverability of public datasets.
A recent study highlights the difficulty in identifying retracted articles in online databases.