Safeguarding scientific image quality and integrity: what more can be done?
Explore how publishers, institutions, and researchers are improving the quality of scientific images.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Explore how publishers, institutions, and researchers are improving the quality of scientific images.
Register today for the 2025 ISMPP Academy!
Discover why structured publication planning is essential for MedTech success and how ISMPP and publication professionals can help provide a strategic advantage.
Find out more about the guidelines aiming to embrace use of AI, ethically.
Explore how inclusive publishing offers scientific and societal value beyond traditional citation metrics.
ISPEP’s white paper questions pharma’s commitment to patient engagement and proposes a 5-point framework for authentic partnerships.
Read more about what health communicators and pharmaceutical companies can do.
Find out about the key findings from ISMPP’s Publication Extenders Evidence Resource.
With peer review requests skyrocketing in recent years, securing reviewers is more challenging than ever: discover some potential solutions.
Discover how generative AI tools can lower the burden of data sharing, enhancing open science.
Open access repositories are underreporting corrections and retractions. Discover how they can step up to pave the way for effective archiving.
Learn how patient journeys can be used more effectively to improve strategic planning, stakeholder engagement, and patient outcomes.
Find out how compliance, innovation, and new engagement strategies are reshaping medical meetings in our summary of The Future of Healthcare Meetings 2024.
As another study reveals an alarming number of hyperprolific authors, find out more about how high-volume publishing can impact research integrity.
Read about a new tool designed to improve the clarity of infographics and visual abstracts in comparative health research.
Discover how efforts to promote open science through new metrics may conflict with initiatives to reform research assessment.