Safeguarding scientific image quality and integrity: what more can be done?
Explore how publishers, institutions, and researchers are improving the quality of scientific images.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Explore how publishers, institutions, and researchers are improving the quality of scientific images.
Find out what the EQUATOR executive group are planning in an effort to promote open science.
Find out how the ERROR project pays reviewers to identify mistakes in published papers.
Plans for a strategic 3-year partnership between the EQUATOR Network and Centre for Open Science.
Read about a new checklist developed to facilitate transparent reporting of consensus methods.
Discover the results of a consensus study in the biomedical research community.
A recent systematic review calls for journal editors to urgently review their submission policies.
Read about a proposed way to tackle the reproducibility crisis in research and accelerate scientific progress.
Read about proposed strategies to make peer review less burdensome and improve the quality of published research.
Find out why sex matters in medical research and why you should consider sex and gender guidelines when reporting data.
AI-based science comes under scrutiny: read about the growing crisis in machine learning.
Find out why, despite implementation of mandates, current research data may not be FAIR.
Publishers join with STM to develop new standardised tools to tackle paper mills.
New guidelines aim to improve early clinical testing of AI-based systems.
Elisabeth Bik discusses the importance of science integrity and the issue of manipulated images within scientific publications.
A recent analysis of randomised controlled vaccine trials suggests there are still improvements to be made.