Are we coming close to accurate AI detection?
Find out about a new method to improve the accuracy of AI detection tools.
Beyond the impact factor: a new way to assess journal quality
Learn how the ‘diversity factor’ could be used to evaluate the true impact of health research.
Breaking barriers: challenging English-language dominance in scientific publishing
Read about changes that journals can make to remove barriers for non-native English speakers, including being open to new technologies such as AI.
Meeting report: summary of Day 2 of the 2024 ISMPP European Meeting
Missed the meeting? Read our report to get up to speed!
Meeting report: summary of Day 1 of the 2024 ISMPP European Meeting
Missed the meeting? Read our report to get up to speed!
When words are not enough: visualising the future of scientific communication
Find out how you can support effective data visualisation in publications.
Do ‘pirate’ sites hinder progress on open access?
‘Pirate’ sites claim to increase access to scientific knowledge, but do they have the opposite effect?
Image duplication in scientific papers: how AI outperforms humans at detecting research misconduct
Discover how innovative AI tools are revolutionising the fight against scientific misconduct, eclipsing a human expert’s efforts in a fraction of the time.
Crossref’s acquisition of the Retraction Watch database: combined forces for research integrity
Find out how this pooling of expertise could make it easier to access detailed information on retractions.
Unlocking public access: are secondary publishing rights the answer?
Learn about planned changes to open access in Canada and their potential impact on academic research.
A new proposal from cOAlition S places researchers in control of academic publishing
Find out more about plans to implement a scholar-led approach to open, rapid research dissemination.
Could you spot AI-generated medical writing?
As concerns persist over the accuracy of content created by generative AI, a recent study looks at whether readers can spot its use in medical writing.
Double blinding in peer review: does author anonymity have benefits?
Find out how anonymising author identity can make peer review more equitable.
Atlas of biomedical literature: a new AI tool to help uncover fabricated studies
Read about a new advance in the fight against research misconduct.
AI in medical publishing: ISMPP’s position statement
Read all about ISMPP’s guidance on the use of AI in medical publications.
Is it time to change our approach to reporting author contributions?
Learn about two ‘easy-to-implement’ methods proposed to change how author contributions are assigned.