Skip to content

Comparing clinical trial results from two searchable registries


Have you ever questioned the validity of clinical trials data? is a searchable registry and database of clinical trials. It is run by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the National Institutes of Health and the available information is submitted by the sponsor of the clinical trial. Drugs@FDA is a searchable registry of medicines approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Both provide clinical trial data, but is the information provided by both sites the same and can one be used to check the validity of the other?

Researchers from The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and the NLM analysed a sample of 100 clinical trials from and compared the results available to those on Drugs@FDA. Reassuringly, there was general agreement in the published primary outcomes and results. However, only around half of the secondary outcomes identified on were stated on Drugs@FDA with results for just 19%, making it difficult to confirm the validity of the data. The reporting of serious adverse events and deaths for some trials were inconsistent between the two sites. Drugs@FDA only includes key information used for regulatory approval and often collates data, such as adverse events, from all relevant trials. This makes it difficult to compare with and validate the data obtained from

For further details of the study, see the full article by Schwartz et al., published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.


Summary by Jo Chapman, PhD from Aspire Scientific.

Never miss a post

Enter your email address below to follow our blog and receive new posts by email.

Never miss
a post

Enter your email address below to follow The Publication Plan and receive new posts by email.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: