Skip to content

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer

An article published in BMC Medicine this week provides insights into how peer reviewers should evaluate statistics in publications.

The article aims to cover the following questions:

  • Is there sufficient detail to review the statistical methods?
  • Are there any common statistical issues?
  • Is the presentation of results appropriate?
  • Is the interpretation of results appropriate?

The authors conclude: “We have provided a number of indicators to assist the non-statistical reviewer… If reviewers lack the appropriate background to positively confirm the appropriateness of any of the manuscript’s statistical aspects, they are encouraged to recommend it for expert statistical review.”.


Peer review

Aspire Scientific Ltd View All

Ryan co-runs Aspire Scientific, a dynamic, forward-thinking medical writing agency. Ryan has a passion for innovation, science and ethical communication.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: