Skip to content

Trial registration may be associated with reduced publication bias

A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine in February 2015 (which is unfortunately behind a pay wall) indicated that clinical trials on treatments for cardiovascular diseases that were registered were less likely to report positive results than unregistered trials. Researchers looked at clinical trials that were published on PubMed in December 2012 and found 191 on cardiovascular diseases, 45% of which had been registered. Of the trials that weren’t registered, 70% reported positive results compared to 52% of the trials that were registered. Publications from trials that weren’t registered also included fewer details about the trial’s methods.

In his Editor’s Note accompanying the article, Joseph Ross writes that, “The higher rate of reporting positive outcomes among non-registered trials raises concerns about bias, suggesting, but not proving, that clinical trial registration at least partially mitigates selective outcome reporting.”

Never miss a post

Enter your email address below to follow our blog and receive new posts by email.

Never miss
a post

Enter your email address below to follow The Publication Plan and receive new posts by email.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Publication Plan for everyone interested in medical writing, the development of medical publications, and publication planning

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading